A recent study by insurance broker Ames & Gough found legal malpractice claims continued to rise in 2020. The group has conducted surveys to gather information about legal malpractice claims for the last ten years, and states that claims with multi-million-dollar...
Key legal malpractice factor spotlighted: the “but for” element
Say that you’re a California resident having what you reasonably believe to be a strong legal claim against a third party for some alleged act of wrongdoing that caused you harm. Notwithstanding the strong merits underlying your lawsuit, you lose the case. The...
Here’s an obvious malpractice concern for CA legal regulators
Message from the California State Bar to practicing attorneys across the state: client money remitted in reliance on your legal representation better be going to you, not a non-attorney. Fee splitting is akin to a dirty word and spells a reproachable practice to state...
Plaintiffs respond to law firm’s representation with a lawsuit
Spokespersons for national law firm Jones Day unsurprisingly term the volunteer work that firm attorneys do on a so-called “pro bono” basis as routinely first-rate and even exceptional. Two individuals who recently filed a lawsuit against the firm in a Southern...
CA attorney discipline: What types of punishment can be ordered?
California has more actively practicing attorneys than any other state in the country. As can be clearly seen by any reader scanning even a few of our blog posts at the long-tenured Los Angeles legal malpractice law firm of Glickman & Glickman, some of those...
Will mitigating factors lessen CA State Bar attorney punishment?
A responsive answer to the above blog query can be expressed in a single word. Namely, that is “sometimes.” It is not always the case that mitigation plays a key role in a California attorney’s disciplinary matter, though. A recent State Bar outcome...
Attorney wrath: recipe for an explosion, not client success
Message to quick-to-anger California attorneys: Your propensity for wrath in legal matters is far more than personally destructive. More importantly, it almost certainly works to the detriment of your clients. The writers of a series of articles spotlighting...
How is the California fingerprinting process going for attorneys?
Getting approximately 190,000 active California attorneys to duly comply with a re-fingerprinting requirement has proven to be a bit of a problem. In fact, the process readily conjures up the maxim, “Easier said than done,” with thousands of practitioners...
Growing number of pelvic mesh plaintiffs now suing attorneys
We surmise that many California readers of our Los Angeles legal malpractice blogs at Glickman & Glickman are not strangers to the material details surrounding the long and sad saga of pelvic mesh litigation. For close to a decade now, a handful-plus of mesh...
What does proving a legal malpractice “case within the case” mean?
You want to make the case that you have a meritorious California legal malpractice case, and you think have a compelling claim. For starters, you suffered damages that caught you totally by surprise. In fact, you thought that the matter you retained your attorney to...