Get The Legal Help You Need: 310-746-5116
A Law Firm Known For Getting Results
A responsive answer to the above blog query can be expressed in a single word. Namely, that is “sometimes.” It is not always the case that mitigation plays a key role in a California attorney’s disciplinary matter, though. A recent State Bar outcome...
Message to quick-to-anger California attorneys: Your propensity for wrath in legal matters is far more than personally destructive. More importantly, it almost certainly works to the detriment of your clients. The writers of a series of articles spotlighting...
Getting approximately 190,000 active California attorneys to duly comply with a re-fingerprinting requirement has proven to be a bit of a problem. In fact, the process readily conjures up the maxim, “Easier said than done,” with thousands of practitioners...
We surmise that many California readers of our Los Angeles legal malpractice blogs at Glickman & Glickman are not strangers to the material details surrounding the long and sad saga of pelvic mesh litigation. For close to a decade now, a handful-plus of mesh...
You want to make the case that you have a meritorious California legal malpractice case, and you think have a compelling claim. For starters, you suffered damages that caught you totally by surprise. In fact, you thought that the matter you retained your attorney to...
California legal authorities – the state’s Supreme Court, State Bar and other regulators – harbor no ambiguity when it comes to making determinations concerning whose interests are paramount in any attorney-client interaction. It is simply a bedrock...
What do you think of when you hear the term “gluttony?” Many people might readily conjure up an image of a person who just can’t leave the buffet. Gluttony might similarly serve as an apt descriptor for an individual whose appetite for accumulation,...
A commentator notes in a recently penned law journal article a widely held misconception concerning legal malpractice. Namely, that is this: the predominant concern of many attorneys that they will be found liable for one or more major mistakes they make in their...
The fingerprinting of California lawyers has long been a statutorily imposed requirement. Notwithstanding the duty, though, the onus has been less than routinely insisted upon by state legal regulators. That inconsistency in adhering to the law led to subsequent...
A key California rule governing attorneys requires all practicing lawyers across the state to inform clients in writing if they don’t carry liability insurance. Proponents of that mandate regard it as a core protection for the general public. Practitioners who don’t...